AR vs. Traditional Content: Performance Metrics
How to build a futureproof relationship with AI
Which performs better: AR or traditional content? Here's the quick answer: AR content delivers higher engagement, better conversions, and deeper user insights. Traditional formats, however, remain effective for broad reach and low-cost campaigns.
Key findings:
Engagement: AR holds attention for 1.5 minutes, while static formats like digital billboards average just 2–3 seconds.
Conversions: AR billboards convert at 0.15–0.4% - 5–6× higher than traditional ones (0.03–0.07%).
Click-through rates (CTR): AR experiences can hit 40%, compared to 0.5–2% for standard ads.
ROI: AR campaigns often have higher upfront costs but yield stronger returns through improved targeting, deeper engagement, and higher sales.
When to choose what:
Use AR for interactive campaigns (e.g., virtual try-ons, 3D product views) aimed at increasing conversions and engagement.
Stick with traditional formats for broad awareness, straightforward messaging, or budget-conscious campaigns.
Quick Comparison:
Metric | AR Content | Traditional Content |
|---|---|---|
Engagement Time | 1.5 minutes | 2–3 seconds |
Conversion Rate | 0.15–0.4% | 0.03–0.07% |
Click-Through Rate | Up to 40% | 0.5–2% |
Reach | Amplified by social sharing | Paid impressions |
Cost | Higher upfront | Lower upfront |
Bottom line: AR excels in driving deeper engagement and higher ROI, especially for products that benefit from interactivity. Traditional formats are still reliable for cost-effective, large-scale campaigns. A hybrid approach often delivers the best results.
The Power of AR: Transforming Consumer Engagement
Key Metrics for AR and Traditional Content
When evaluating AR and traditional content, it's essential to use consistent business outcomes - like impressions, clicks, conversions, and revenue - as the foundation. This ensures a fair comparison. AR experiences, however, go a step further by offering detailed behavioral data, showing not just if users viewed the content but how they interacted with it over time.
The distinction lies in the depth of engagement. Traditional metrics often focus on surface-level data like clicks or views, while AR metrics dive into the specifics of user interactions. These shared metrics provide a starting point for comparison before exploring the unique insights AR campaigns can deliver.
Shared Metrics for Both Content Types
Both AR and traditional campaigns rely on universal performance metrics, making cross-format comparisons possible:
Impressions and Reach: These metrics measure how many times content is displayed and the number of unique viewers. AR campaigns add another layer by tracking unique activations, offering a clearer picture of exposure.
Views or Sessions: For traditional content, this includes video views or page sessions. In AR, it refers to how many times users launch the AR experience.
Click-Through Rate (CTR): CTR tracks how often people respond immediately. While traditional ads often achieve single-digit CTRs, some AR experiences boast rates as high as 40%.
Engagement Rate: This measures active user interactions. For traditional formats, it might involve likes, comments, or time on a page. AR engagement includes actions like taps, swipes, and rotations within a 3D space.
Conversion Rate: This shows the percentage of users completing a desired action, such as making a purchase. While traditional digital billboards convert at 0.03–0.07%, AR billboards see rates of 0.15–0.4%, representing a 5–6× improvement.
Return on Ad Spend (ROAS): ROAS calculates campaign revenue against ad spend. For example, a campaign might return $4.50 for every $1.00 spent.
Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC): CAC is determined by dividing total campaign costs by the number of new customers gained. A $10,000 campaign that brings in 200 customers would have a $50.00 CAC.
AR-Specific Performance Metrics
AR campaigns go beyond standard metrics, offering more detailed insights into user behavior:
Activation Rate: This measures how many users launch the AR experience after encountering an entry point, like scanning a QR code or tapping a "View in AR" button.
Session Duration (Dwell Time): Tracks how long users spend in the AR experience on average.
Interaction Depth: Measures specific interactions such as rotating, zooming, or changing colors. For instance, if 80% of users change a product's color but only 10% zoom in, this data highlights which features resonate most.
Return Engagement: Tracks how often users revisit the AR experience, providing insight into sustained interest.
Spatial Analytics: Records geolocation data and user movement relative to physical stores. For example, AR try-ons might be most popular within a 2-mile radius of retail locations, helping brands refine their strategies.
CTA Engagement within AR: Monitors interactions with embedded calls-to-action, like "Buy Now" or "Learn More", within the AR environment.
Rewarded AR Ad Experiences: Reports show engagement rates of 76% and completion rates of 95%, demonstrating strong user participation.
How Metrics Are Reported
Both AR and traditional content metrics follow standard U.S. conventions, ensuring clarity and consistency:
Monetary Metrics: Revenue, ad spend, ROAS, CAC, and average order value are displayed in U.S. dollars, using commas for thousands and periods for decimals. For example, a campaign might generate $125,000.50 in revenue with a ROAS of $4.20 per $1.00 spent.
Percentages: Metrics like CTR, engagement rate, and conversion rate are expressed with the % symbol, often rounded to one or two decimal places. For instance, a traditional video ad might show a 3.5% CTR, while an AR experience could report a 0.25% conversion rate.
Time-Based Metrics: Session durations are reported in seconds or minutes:seconds format, such as 90 seconds, 1:30, or 1.5 minutes. AR reports often provide more detailed breakdowns of time spent on specific interactions.
AR analytics platforms typically present these metrics in dashboards similar to web analytics tools but with added insights specific to 3D interactions, spatial data, and activation funnels. In contrast, traditional reporting focuses more on basic engagement metrics like page views, clicks, and shares. This makes AR particularly valuable for deeper behavioral insights and improving campaign performance.
AR Content Performance: Engagement, Reach, and Conversions
AR content consistently outshines traditional formats when it comes to capturing attention, expanding organic reach, and driving conversions. In many cases, it delivers engagement and sales results that are several times better than more conventional approaches.
Engagement Metrics for AR Content
The interactive nature of AR makes it a standout for audience engagement. For instance, rewarded AR ad formats - where users actively participate in the experience - boast engagement rates of around 76% and completion rates nearing 95%. Web-based AR campaigns are also impressive, with click-through rates reaching up to 40% directly from the AR environment, a stark improvement compared to standard digital ad benchmarks in the U.S.
What sets AR apart is its ability to let users interact deeply with products - whether they're rotating items, trying on accessories, or exploring features in detail. This hands-on interaction fosters a more deliberate and informed evaluation process, significantly boosting purchase intent. Unlike static images or quick video clips, AR creates a more immersive experience, which naturally leads to greater engagement and organic reach.
Reach and Sharing Potential of AR Campaigns
AR campaigns aren't just about individual interaction - they're built to spread. When users share AR filters or virtual try-ons on social platforms, brands gain access to entirely new audiences. This ripple effect is evident in metrics like unique users reached, social shares, the volume of user-generated content, and the extended reach from shared posts. By designing AR experiences with sharing in mind, brands can unlock a level of exposure that traditional content - often dependent on paid media - struggles to achieve. This extended reach contributes to stronger brand visibility and, ultimately, better sales performance.
Conversion Rates and Revenue Impact of AR
Driving sales is the ultimate goal of any marketing effort, and AR excels here too. AR billboards, for example, outperform traditional formats in conversions by building purchase confidence. Virtual try-ons allow shoppers to visualize how a product - like eyeglasses or furniture - fits into their lives, reducing hesitation and lowering return rates.
Additionally, AR experiences often encourage users to explore more options and even add complementary items to their carts, increasing the average order value. For marketers focused on ROI, this translates to higher returns on ad spend and reduced customer acquisition costs. Combined with its ability to engage and reach audiences effectively, AR proves to be a powerful tool for driving revenue. Platforms that simplify the creation and scaling of AR content further enhance its integration into campaigns, making it easier for brands to tap into its full potential.
Traditional Content Performance: Benchmarks and Challenges
Traditional content formats - think static images, videos, blog posts, display ads, and digital billboards - have been the backbone of digital marketing for years. While they're familiar and relatively easy to implement, their performance metrics reveal both their strengths and areas where they fall short, especially when compared to more interactive formats.
Performance Benchmarks for Traditional Content
Performance expectations for traditional content are fairly well-established, particularly in the U.S. market, where results often fall within predictable ranges.
Display ads generally see click-through rates (CTR) of just 0.05–0.1%, meaning only a tiny percentage of viewers take action.
Email marketing fares better, with CTRs of 2–5% for B2C campaigns and 1–3% for B2B.
Social media posts land somewhere in the middle, with CTRs ranging between 0.5–2%, depending on the platform and targeting.
When it comes to engagement depth, traditional content faces limitations. Blog posts, for example, hold a reader's attention for an average of 1–2 minutes, often accompanied by bounce rates of 40–60%. Meanwhile, digital billboards capture attention for a fleeting 2–3 seconds - barely enough time to register the brand name.
Conversion rates tell a similar story. E-commerce landing pages typically convert at 1–3%, while lead generation pages see slightly lower rates at 0.5–2%. Digital billboards, often used for direct-response campaigns, manage a mere 0.03–0.07% conversion rate. Social media ads, on the other hand, perform better with conversion rates of 1–5%.
For content marketing programs, the goal often includes a 10–20% month-over-month growth in organic traffic, with content-to-lead conversion rates hovering around 2–4%. B2B programs, however, usually sit on the lower end of this range. While these benchmarks set clear expectations, they also expose the inherent limitations of traditional formats.
Limitations of Traditional Content
Traditional content tends to encourage passive engagement. Metrics like impressions and clicks provide only surface-level insights into user behavior. People may scroll past an ad, skim a headline, or briefly watch a video without forming a meaningful connection. This shallow engagement makes it harder to create lasting brand impressions.
Another drawback is the lack of interaction depth. Unlike newer formats, traditional content doesn’t allow users to explore products in detail - there’s no way to rotate an image, try something on virtually, or personalize the experience. This can leave potential customers feeling uncertain about their purchase decisions.
Marketers are also limited by the behavioral data traditional formats provide. While metrics like impressions, clicks, and time on page are standard, they don’t reveal much about user intent. For instance, which product features caught their attention? Where did they hesitate? What might have convinced them to buy? Traditional formats simply don’t capture this level of detail.
The challenges don’t stop there. Measurement accuracy is often an issue. Impressions, for example, are usually approximations rather than precise counts. Digital billboard traffic is based on models, not actual engagement. Tracking how far a social share travels or pinpointing the exact content that led to a conversion is also tricky, especially when multiple channels are involved.
On top of that, privacy regulations are making it harder to track users. With the decline of third-party cookies and tighter restrictions on data collection, traditional content becomes even more difficult to personalize or optimize in real time.
Finally, traditional formats often struggle to create emotional impact. Static images and linear videos rarely deliver the kind of immersive, memorable experiences that foster strong brand connections. This can weaken both recall and the overall customer relationship compared to more engaging formats.
Where Traditional Content Works Best
Despite its limitations, traditional content still shines in certain scenarios, especially when simplicity, speed, and broad reach are the primary goals.
Awareness campaigns: For mass awareness efforts like TV spots or social media posts, traditional formats are both cost-effective and easy to scale.
Straightforward messaging: Simple promotions like "20% off this weekend" or informational content such as FAQs don’t require interactivity. These messages are well-suited to traditional formats.
Budget-conscious campaigns: Producing text, images, and basic videos is quicker and more affordable than creating interactive or augmented reality (AR) content.
Specific audiences: Certain industries and demographics, such as local services or older B2B audiences, still prefer traditional formats like email, brochures, and websites, where AR adoption remains low.
Looking ahead, the rise of AI-powered search tools is expected to reduce traditional search engine traffic by 25% by 2026. This shift is prompting marketers to rethink their strategies, considering not just traditional metrics but also how content performs across emerging channels.
Traditional content isn’t going away anytime soon. It continues to deliver value in scenarios where simplicity and reach matter most. However, its limitations highlight the growing need for marketers to explore more interactive and data-rich formats, especially as the digital landscape evolves.
Direct Comparison: AR vs. Traditional Content
After breaking down the metrics, it's clear that AR and traditional content deliver very different results across key performance areas.
Engagement: Interactive vs. Passive Experiences
AR billboards grab attention for an average of 1.5 minutes, compared to just 2–3 seconds for traditional digital billboards. This extended interaction directly impacts conversion rates, making AR a standout performer.
For instance, a rewarded AR ad campaign highlighted by Adweek achieved an average engagement rate of 76% and a completion rate of 95% for 30-second AR experiences. In contrast, standard video ads often see completion rates of just 15% to 35%, depending on platform features like skipping options.
On average, AR billboards deliver 4.2× higher engagement rates than traditional billboards. Unlike static or passive content, AR invites users to actively participate - whether it’s tapping, rotating, or virtually trying on products. This hands-on interaction not only holds attention but also deepens the connection with the brand.
Brand recall further highlights this gap. Studies show 63% of viewers remember AR billboards, compared to just 28% for traditional billboards. The immersive nature of AR significantly boosts memory retention, and this heightened engagement often leads to increased social sharing, giving AR campaigns a distinct edge in reach.
Reach and Amplification: Social Sharing Potential
Both AR and traditional content start with standard metrics like impressions and audience size. But AR brings an extra layer: social sharing and user-generated content.
AR experiences are inherently shareable. Think about branded AR filters or virtual try-ons - users love to capture and post these moments, amplifying your brand’s reach organically. This kind of sharing doesn’t just increase visibility; it does so without extra ad spend.
Traditional content, while shareable to an extent, doesn’t inspire the same level of organic buzz. Static images or standard videos often depend on paid impressions or algorithm-driven placements to reach audiences.
This difference becomes evident in earned media value. AR campaigns frequently spark press coverage, word-of-mouth buzz, and viral moments, all of which extend their reach far beyond the initial audience. For U.S. brands, this means AR can effectively transform users into active promoters, significantly boosting your overall audience size. While this expanded reach is great for visibility, the real question is how well these interactions translate into sales.
Conversion and ROI: Revenue Impact
When it comes to driving revenue, AR consistently outperforms traditional formats. AR billboards achieve conversion rates of 0.15–0.4%, while traditional digital billboards lag behind at 0.03–0.07%. That’s a 5–6× improvement in conversion efficiency.
Web-based AR experiences also shine, delivering click-through rates (CTR) of up to 40% to product pages, social profiles, or purchase flows. Compare this to traditional display and social ads, which typically see CTRs in the 0.5–2% range.
Another advantage of AR is its ability to directly measure purchase actions, linking engagement to sales. Traditional formats, on the other hand, often rely on multi-touch attribution and retargeting to achieve similar results.
When evaluating return on ad spend (ROAS) in dollar terms, it’s important to weigh both costs and revenue. While AR campaigns often require higher upfront investment - like creating 3D assets and interactive experiences - they deliver higher conversion rates, longer engagement times, and richer first-party data. This data can then be used to improve targeting and personalization in future campaigns.
In fact, AR billboards have been shown to boost campaign efficiency by 35–45% through better targeting and personalized interactions. While traditional content may have an edge in cost per thousand impressions (CPM) and scalability, it can’t match AR’s depth of engagement and conversion potential.
For brands looking to measure ROI, key metrics like incremental revenue per visitor, cost per conversion, and revenue per 1,000 impressions provide a clear picture. AR tends to excel in industries where product interaction plays a big role - think beauty, fashion, furniture, and automotive. Meanwhile, traditional content works best for simpler messages, time-sensitive promotions, or top-of-funnel awareness.
Many U.S. brands are finding success by combining the two approaches. For example, traditional formats like QR codes or links can drive traffic to AR experiences. This strategy allows brands to tap into AR’s higher engagement and conversion rates while maximizing overall revenue impact.
How to Measure AR and Traditional Campaigns
Measuring AR and traditional campaigns side by side requires a unified approach. By using consistent tracking methods and metrics, you can make direct comparisons and understand which format delivers better results.
Unified Analytics Framework
To compare AR and traditional campaigns effectively, you need consistency in tracking every interaction. This means using the same UTM parameters and event labels across all content. For example, if you're running a sneaker launch campaign on Instagram, your AR filter might be tagged like this:
utm_campaign: sneaker_launch
utm_source: instagram
utm_medium: ar_filter
For a traditional video ad in the same campaign, you'd use the same campaign and source tags but adjust the medium tag (e.g., utm_medium=video_ad).
Event names like product_view, try_on, share, and cta_click should also remain consistent across formats. This ensures that conversion goals - whether email signups, purchases, or demo requests - are measured the same way for both AR and traditional content. Additionally, apply identical attribution windows (e.g., a 7-day click model) to ensure fair comparisons when users interact with multiple touchpoints.
Core Metrics to Track for Both Formats
Metrics for AR and traditional campaigns can be grouped into three categories: awareness, engagement, and conversion.
Awareness: Track reach and impressions. For AR, this includes unique activations and views, while traditional campaigns measure ad impressions and unique web visitors.
Engagement: Measure time spent interacting with content. For AR, this could be dwell time in an AR experience or interaction rates with features like 3D rotation or virtual try-on. Traditional metrics might include click-through rates, scroll depth, or video completion rates. Social shares also provide a comparable measure, as AR experiences often inspire users to share their interactions, just as traditional campaigns rely on share buttons and organic amplification.
Conversion and ROI: Track metrics like conversion rate, cost per acquisition, and revenue per visitor. Whether it’s clicks from an AR experience to a product page or from a traditional ad to a landing page, applying a consistent measurement framework allows you to objectively compare cost per result and revenue impact across formats.
Using Platforms like TwinTone for Unified Reporting
Platforms like TwinTone make it easier to centralize performance data from both AR and traditional campaigns. These dashboards pull in metrics like viewer count, engagement duration, click-through rates (CTR), and conversions, enabling side-by-side comparisons and A/B testing.
With TwinTone, brands can track metrics from AR filters, AI Twin live streams, blog posts, social media ads, and more - all in one place. By consolidating data from sources like WebAR platforms, social AR applications, and traditional web analytics, you get a clear, unified view of performance. This approach helps answer crucial questions, such as which format provides better ROI, how engagement patterns differ, and where marketing budgets should be allocated.
Taking this unified approach will help you allocate resources wisely and maximize your campaign’s impact.
Conclusion: Choosing the Right Content for Your Goals
Key Takeaways from the Comparison
AR and traditional content each bring their own strengths to the table. AR shines when it comes to engagement quality, conversion rates, and detailed behavioral insights, while traditional formats excel at providing broad reach, quick deployment, and simplicity.
Here’s the data: AR experiences deliver 4.2× higher engagement quality and 5–6× better conversion rates compared to traditional digital formats. WebAR campaigns can achieve click-through rates as high as 40%, far surpassing standard paid social benchmarks. One standout AR ad campaign boasted a 76% average engagement rate and a 95% completion rate, showing that users not only start AR experiences - they stick with them to the end.
On the flip side, traditional content is faster to produce, more affordable to test, and easier to scale across various channels. Metrics like impressions, page views, and click-through rates are well-established, making performance tracking straightforward. Traditional formats are ideal for top-of-funnel awareness, quick-turn promotions, and products that don’t require interactive exploration.
Ultimately, it’s not about which format is “better.” It’s about choosing the right tool for your campaign’s objectives, audience preferences, and budget. AR offers rich user data to refine merchandising and targeting, while traditional content provides essential baseline metrics - like impressions and engagement rates - that fuel broad marketing strategies.
When to Choose AR or Traditional Content
To make the most of your campaigns, align your content format with your strategic goals.
Go with AR when deep engagement is key. AR is perfect for campaigns that rely on helping users understand a product and driving high-intent conversions. Think furniture, beauty products, or eyewear - AR lets users see how these items fit into their lives. It’s also a smart choice for mobile-first audiences, especially Gen Z and Millennials who are comfortable with camera-based experiences on social platforms. AR works best when your campaign aims for dwell times beyond 30–60 seconds, improved conversion rates, or when higher production costs are offset by increased revenue per user.
Stick with traditional content for maximum reach at lower costs. Traditional formats are your go-to for high-reach, top-of-funnel awareness campaigns where cost-per-thousand impressions (CPM) and frequency matter more than interaction. They excel in time-sensitive promotions like Black Friday or flash sales, where speed and scalability are critical. Traditional content is also a better fit for low-consideration products or simple offers that don’t require interactive exploration. If you’re working with tight budgets or testing early-stage ideas, traditional formats deliver predictable results with established benchmarks.
Consider a hybrid strategy for campaigns needing both scale and depth. Each format serves a unique role, and combining them can amplify results. For example, use traditional content - like social posts, display ads, or SEO-driven blogs - to build awareness, then guide users to an AR experience for high-intent engagement. A social ad promoting an AR try-on feature is a great way to merge the broad reach of traditional formats with the interactive depth of AR.
To manage this hybrid approach, unified analytics tools can help. Platforms like TwinTone make it easier to centralize content creation and performance tracking across formats. With features like on-demand UGC and 24/7 live product demos, brands can test narratives, calls to action, and formats while comparing engagement and revenue impact in one place. TwinTone’s tools simplify cross-format decision-making by aggregating data like watch time, comments, click-throughs, and conversions, helping brands allocate budgets to the formats that drive the highest returns.
The key is to map each campaign to your primary goal - whether it’s awareness, engagement, or conversion - and evaluate your audience’s readiness for AR along with your production budget. If your focus is on showcasing complex products and gathering detailed behavioral data, AR should lead the way. If your priority is efficient CPMs and broad reach, traditional formats are the better choice. And when you need both, blend the two strategically and monitor performance through a unified framework. This approach helps marketers align their content strategies with their goals while maximizing results.
FAQs
What advantages does AR content offer over traditional content in marketing campaigns?
AR content stands out from traditional formats by delivering a whole new level of engagement, reach, and conversion rates. Its interactive and immersive qualities grab attention like nothing else, creating experiences that stick with audiences and leave a lasting impression.
With platforms like TwinTone, brands can take things even further. They can generate on-demand user-generated content (UGC) and run 24/7 live product showcases featuring AI Twins modeled after real creators. This strategy not only fosters genuine connections with audiences but also scales up sales effortlessly, making it easier than ever to engage with consumers in a dynamic, impactful way.
How do AR performance metrics offer more valuable insights compared to traditional content metrics?
AR-specific performance metrics offer a closer look at user behavior by focusing on unique interactions like manipulating 3D objects, the time spent engaging with augmented features, and how users integrate AR into their daily lives. These metrics provide insights that go far beyond traditional measures like clicks or views, painting a more dynamic picture of user engagement.
For instance, AR content tends to encourage higher engagement rates because it requires active participation rather than passive consumption. This hands-on interaction often fosters stronger connections with a brand, boosts conversion rates, and generates more meaningful engagement data. These insights empower businesses to fine-tune their strategies and get the most out of their investment.
When is it most effective to combine AR and traditional content?
A mix of augmented reality (AR) and traditional content can work wonders when aiming to increase both engagement and reach. Traditional content serves as a great way to introduce a product and provide essential details, while AR steps in to offer users an interactive and immersive way to dive deeper and connect with the product.
This blend is especially effective for things like product launches, virtual try-ons, or interactive marketing campaigns. These scenarios benefit from the balance of static content for information and dynamic AR experiences for interaction. With the help of AI-driven tools, brands can craft seamless, engaging experiences that not only capture attention but also build stronger connections and improve conversion rates.
